Book
New Ways in Psychoanalysis
Horney's second book takes up Freud's theory point by point, to separate what she held to be its lasting findings from the premises she thought had hampered it. She keeps what she calls Freud's fundamental findings: that psychic processes are strictly determined, that actions and feelings may have unconscious motives and that resistance guards them, the role of emotional forces and conflict, repression and the other defences, the meaning of dreams, the formative power of early experience, transference and free association. She rejects his instinct theory and the mechanistic and evolutionistic thinking beneath it, together with his neglect of culture. Her thesis is that psychoanalysis should outgrow the limits set by its being an instinctivistic and a genetic psychology. She says that she is not founding a new school. Successive chapters re-examine the libido theory, which she judges unsubstantiated, the Oedipus complex, narcissism, feminine psychology and the death instinct. They also treat the emphasis on childhood, transference, culture and neurosis, the ego and the id, anxiety, the super-ego, neurotic guilt feelings and masochistic phenomena. In place of instinctual drives she puts neurotic trends. These are strivings for safety and satisfaction, such as the need for affection or for perfection, by which a person who feels helpless in a hostile world copes with it in some measure of safety. Anxiety arises when such a safety device is endangered. The last chapter, on therapy, sets as its aim restoring the patient to themself, so that the safety devices are no longer needed and spontaneity returns. Horney acknowledges debts to Erich Fromm, Wilhelm Reich, Harald Schultz-Hencke and Max Horkheimer. She credits Fromm with showing how central the loss of self is to neurosis.
Main ideas
- Freud's fundamental findings are kept: determinism, unconscious motivation and resistance, repression, the importance of early experience, transference and free association.
- His instinct theory and its mechanistic, evolutionistic premises are rejected: psychoanalysis should outgrow being an instinctivistic and genetic psychology.
- The libido theory is unsubstantiated; the Oedipus complex, narcissism, feminine psychology and the death instinct are re-examined in turn.
- Neurotic trends, strivings for safety and satisfaction in a world felt as hostile, take the place of instinctual drives.
- Anxiety arises when a safety device on which the person depends is endangered.
- Therapy aims to restore the person to themself, so that the safety devices are no longer needed and spontaneity returns.
- Culture shapes neurosis, a view Horney credits in part to Fromm, together with the significance of the loss of self.
What it shows
- 1923
Karen Horney critiqued Penis envy
From her congress paper of 1922 onward Horney questioned the view that penis envy is primary and decisive for women, calling it unsatisfying for biological thinking and a product of masculine bias; by 1939 she read it as culturally reinforced.
- 1939
Karen Horney introduced Neurotic trends
Horney proposed the term in New Ways in Psychoanalysis as a counterpart to Freud's instinctual drives, and in Our Inner Conflicts regrouped the trends into moving toward, against and away from people.
- 1939
Karen Horney critiqued Oedipus complex
Horney denied the Oedipus complex a biological basis, reading the child's attachment to a parent as a response to conditions in the family.
- 1939
Karen Horney critiqued Narcissism
Horney rejected narcissism as a libidinal investment of the ego and redescribed it as self-inflation, a neurotic trend that stands in for lost self-esteem.
Neurotic trends derives from Basic anxiety
Horney presents the neurotic trends as the child's ways of securing safety against basic anxiety, each of the three later attitudes stressing one of its elements.
Show all 7 Show fewer
- 1926
Karen Horney disputed with Sigmund Freud
Horney contested Freud's account of female development in the 1920s, and in 1939 extended the dispute to his instinct theory as a whole, while declaring that she meant to build on his fundamental findings.
Erich Fromm influenced Karen Horney
Horney credited Fromm with sharpening her sense of the cultural and social determinants of neurosis.