The graph of concepts, people and works

Drawing the graph…

psychopedia
Legend

Nodes

Relations

At rest every relation is a thin grey line. Its colour shows on hover and in focus.

Concept

Drive/structure and relational/structure models

Also known as Drive/structure modelRelational/structure modelDrive model and relational model
+1 more Drive model versus relational model

The two families into which Jay Greenberg and Stephen Mitchell sorted psychoanalytic theories in Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory (1983), according to what each takes as the basic stuff of the mind. In the drive/structure model, which begins with Freud, relations with others are derived from the drives: other people matter as targets or means of drive satisfaction, and mental structure grows out of managing drive pressure. In the relational/structure model, which begins with Sullivan's interpersonal theory and Fairbairn's object relations, relations with others come first and mental structure is built out of them. The authors held that the two rest on incompatible views of human nature, and read later theories either as accommodating relational findings inside drive theory (Hartmann, Mahler, Jacobson, Kernberg) or as mixing the two models (Kohut, Sandler).

Development

  • 1983

    introduced by Stephen A. Mitchell

    With Greenberg, Mitchell drew the line between theories in which relations with others serve the drives and theories in which relations come first. That division became the founding frame of the relational school.

    In Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory (1983)

  • 1983

    introduced by Jay Greenberg

    Greenberg, Mitchell's co-author on the 1983 book, shares credit for the two-model classification. Unlike Mitchell, he later argued that psychoanalysis cannot do without a drive concept.

    In Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory (1983)

Relations

  • 1983 introduced by Stephen A. Mitchell
    With Greenberg, Mitchell drew the line between theories in which relations with others serve the drives and theories in which relations come first. That division became the founding frame of the relational school.
  • 1983 introduced by Jay Greenberg
    Greenberg, Mitchell's co-author on the 1983 book, shares credit for the two-model classification. Unlike Mitchell, he later argued that psychoanalysis cannot do without a drive concept.
  • gave rise to Relational psychoanalysis
    The school takes its name and starting point from the 1983 split between drive/structure and relational/structure models. It grew from the relational side of that divide.

Works

  • 1983

    Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory

    Jay R. Greenberg and Stephen A. Mitchell's book, published by Harvard University Press in 1983, compares the major psychoanalytic theories according to one question: where each places a person's relations with others. The authors distinguish two basic models. In the drive/structure model, which descends from Freud, relations with others are generated and shaped by the need to gratify drives. In the relational/structure model, relations are primary and cannot be reduced to anything more basic. The book reads Harry Stack Sullivan's interpersonal psychoanalysis and the British object relations theories of Melanie Klein, Fairbairn, Winnicott and Guntrip as radical alternatives to drive theory. It reads the ego psychology of Hartmann, Mahler, Jacobson and Kernberg as a strategy of accommodation, which widens drive theory to take object relations in. Kohut and Sandler are treated as mixed-model strategies that combine elements of both. A final chapter follows the divergence between the two models into debates on diagnosis and clinical technique.

    Copyright Life + 70 years Status unknown Death year unknown for Jay R. Greenberg.United States In copyright Published in 1983; protected through 2078.

See also

People

References

  1. Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory1983Evidence for a relation
Esc

↑ ↓ to move · Enter to go · Esc to close